티스토리 툴바

Daum
Tistory
로그인

방명록

  1. Valeria_fromAF 2011/11/29 19:51  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.

  2. Destiny_fromAF 2011/11/28 04:07  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.

  3. Abigail_fromAD 2011/11/27 17:01  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.

  4. Leah_fromAD 2011/11/26 08:32  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :)

  5. Arianna_fromAD 2011/11/24 23:19  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.

  6. Rachel_fromAD 2011/11/23 12:48  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was “only reading a WSJ article” on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.

  7. Naomi_fromAD 2011/11/22 03:22  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.

  8. Angelina_fromAD 2011/11/20 18:53  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list…..perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!

  9. Mia_fromAD 2011/11/19 11:24  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.

  10. Evelyn_fromAD 2011/11/18 02:41  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.

  11. Camila_fromAC 2011/11/16 19:14  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.

  12. Lauren_fromAC 2011/11/14 22:47  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list…..perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!

  13. Camila_fromAC 2011/11/12 13:41  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.

  14. Addison_fromAC 2011/11/11 01:13  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.

  15. Charlotte_fromAC 2011/11/09 08:02  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.

  16. Alexa_fromAC 2011/10/30 17:41  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.

  17. Ashley_fromAB 2011/10/22 23:30  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.)

  18. Mariah_fromAA 2011/10/19 07:52  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.

  19. Riley_fromAA 2011/10/11 16:03  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.)

  20. Elizabeth_fromTJ 2011/10/08 11:53  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.

  21. Destiny_fromTJ 2011/10/06 20:55  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.

  22. Natalie_fromUS 2011/10/04 09:09  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.

  23. Jocelyn_fromUS 2011/10/03 01:15  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    I’m not sure what you have against “The Five”. I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.

  24. Genesis_fromUS 2011/10/01 20:28  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.

  25. Rachel_fromUS 2011/09/30 08:16  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.

  26. Ella_fromKZ 2011/09/27 10:59  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.

  27. Riley_fromUZ 2011/09/20 23:54  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.

  28. Zoe_fromUZ 2011/09/19 17:18  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.

  29. Savannah_fromUZ 2011/09/18 10:25  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.)

  30. Charlotte_fromUZ 2011/09/14 14:21  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.